On Friday I attended an excellent conference at our Board office: Wired for Success. I find that sessions like those energize me, giving me new ideas to explore but, more importantly, space to reflect on my own education process in the classroom.
The day began with this popular YouTube video:
Lately I’ve been thinking about the use of technology in the classroom (surprise!) and that big Media Studies strand in our provincial curriculum documents. (If the Ontario curriculum is unfamiliar to you, I’ll just quickly summarize: we have four major curriculum strands that are to be incorporated into all English courses: Writing, Oral Communication, Reading & Literature, and Media Studies.) It’s striking, isn’t it? Media Studies on par with Reading and Writing.
I know that when I first saw the new curriculum with Media Studies identified as such a major strand, I was surprised at the decision to do it that way. To my mind, the English classroom is about oral communication, reading, and writing, and “media” just encompasses the many non-traditional vehicles for engaging in those practices. Oral communication? We could build learning around a speech in front of a class, or around a podcast. Reading? There are my favourite novels to work with, and there are movies that operate with a grammar and syntax of their own. Writing? Students could practice with a short story, an essay or a blog.
But a colleague pointed out to me the wisdom of separating Media Studies from the other strands: it isn’t easily ignored this way. We teachers can tend to find something that works and we’re comfortable with, and keep using it. Why not? So that fantastic novel unit that we developed a year ago gets trotted out again this year, with a few updates … and then next year … and so on. It is extremely difficult to find the time or inclination to re-work our teaching approaches from the ground up. It’s unnerving, uncomfortable, and even scary. Oh, and it takes time, something we lack when school is in session.
A new strand in the curriculum document, however, can give some of us that push we need to re-think things. Just asking ourselves how we are meeting the expectations of the four strands makes us reconsider our approach and do more than just tweak our unit plans. Ignore an entire strand, however, and be prepared to answer to parents, administration, and even colleagues.
So I was excited to be a part of this conference at our Board. And while the presentations were superior and challenging in many ways, I did have one concern: balance. As I participated in the sessions, I began to get the impression that instead of Grade 11 English we were hoping to offer “Moodle 101″; or instead of ENG 4C it was to be “Wikispaces for Beginners.”
Don’t get me wrong: I’ve used wikis in my English classrooms for the last three years, blogs for the past four, and websites before that. I believe that these tools are important and need to be used as platforms for learning. I think that what I was struggling with was the hype around the technology itself without a genuine discussion of how that technology supports different types of learning. I fully intend to use different technology and media in the classroom, but always with the goal of improving my students’ skills in reading, writing, and oral communication.
Next semester, I’m going to test out a Ning with one of my courses and a Moodle with another. Ultimately, however, my students’ learning will be evidenced by their essays on Jane Eyre, their dramatic presentations of King Lear, and their analysis of gender stereotyping in advertising.

As I mentioned in my