Shifting our educational culture

I share Will Richardson‘s questions about changing our culture:

So, it comes back to what is to me at least, the big question these days. Not how do we help teachers get their brains around these tools in terms of their own personal learning practice (which is still hugely important), but how do we help schools and districts to begin to reshape their culture around learning in more collaborative, connected environments? How do we get to the point where we’re not just seeing individual teachers and classrooms make the shift, but where we are seeing schools as a whole beginning to shift as well?

As facilitator of a program intended to help students prep for the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test(OSSLT), I am really feeling the tension between what I’ll call ”multiliteracy” and “conventional literacy.”   In my regular courses, my goal is to support student multiliteracy because (a) it is in line with curriculum expectations, and (b) I think that students who can only read and write text on paper are not going to be functionally literate in our society.  However, students’ literacy levels are formally determined by a standardized test that is based on conventional literacy.

(Before I go on, I’ll just say that I am not opposed to standardized testing, because I value the aggregate information that is available from it.  More on that another day.)

I am wondering, though, if there is another way to handle the testing — a way that is culture-shifting.  Some of the concerns that I have with the current testing approach are:

  • Students write using pen and paper.  For some, this is not their most familiar communication medium, so they are disadvantaged.  (Clarification:  I’m not advocating a text-messaging test.)
  • Students write in the same format every time:  a news article and a five-paragraph essay are the essential written components.  These are limiting forms.
  • The same format every year means that our regular courses are being tailored more and more to meet the expectations of the literacy test.  Hours of class time being spent learning the specifics of writing a news article.  I wonder how often students will have to write a news article in their futures?

I don’t have any solutions, just questions right now.  How can our education system shift its culture to embrace multiliteracy?  Can standardized testing be adapted to support a new culture of collaboration, or is it fundamentally incompatible?  As I prepare for another literacy support session, how do I make this most helpful for students:  do I teach them to write the test, or do I teach them to read and write texts?

Thinking about why

Ryan Bretag makes a good point about asking why – not just what and how – we’re using technology in education:

In the midst of this exciting time of change, it is easy to focus on what tool … It is also just as easy to focus on the how given the various details needed and the actual fun that goes into such details.

However, skipping the why because of the excitement of the what and how is a poor practice to get caught up in for educators and it surely is unacceptable for those in roles to assist educators in such planning.

This adds another dimension to my earlier questions about evaluating technology use in the classroom. Or maybe just simplifies it.

Anyway, I’m going to confess to using technology for a “why” that has nothing to do with offering new learning experiences or assessment strategies or any other appropriately educative reason. I’m using it for the sheer excitement factor.

I’ll explain: Right now I’m teaching an after-school literacy class for students needing extra support to prepare for the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test (OSSLT). Many of these students are there because their parents were convinced by their practice test results and a follow-up conversation that they indeed would benefit from extra help. And I am responsible for the 2-hour extra help sessions after school.

Stereotypically students who aren’t performing well on the practice tests aren’t all that excited about literacy in general. And I find that adding another two hours to their school day doesn’t usually increase their enthusiasm. They tend to show up tired, frustrated, and ready to be bored.

I tried to use pen and paper work today, rationalizing that they will have to write their test using those old-fashioned tools.

Next day I am going to use some online literacy excercises simply because a computer might make things more interesting for some students. And hopefully if they’re even just a tiny bit interested, then they might be able to get something out of this class.

We just might all survive it.